In 2024, Evolution Mining conducted an environmental assessment and disclosed corporate waste management data in accordance with recognized sustainability reporting standards. The company provided a breakdown of its waste by type (hazardous vs non-hazardous) and treatment method (recovery vs disposal), enabling greater transparency into its waste handling and environmental practices.
Metric (tonnes) | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 - 2017 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Total Waste Generated | 0000000 | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | 0000000 |
Total Waste Recovered | 0000000 | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | 0000000 |
Total Hazardous Waste Generated | 0000000 | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | 0000000 |
Non-Hazardous Waste Disposed | 0000000 | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | 0000000 |
This table provides a simplified preview of selected waste data points. To access the complete dataset with full disclosures and structure, create a free account to purchase the full dataset.
In 2024, Evolution Mining generated a total of 46,932,380 metric tonnes of waste.
Of this amount, 1.14% of Evolution Mining's total waste generated was recovered through methods such as recycling, reuse, or composting, while 98.86% was disposed of through landfilling, incineration, or combustion.
In 2024, Evolution Mining reported a total waste generation of 46,932,380 metric tonnes, of which 1.14% was recovered through recycling, reuse, or composting. This low recovery rate highlights limited waste diversion and suggests that Evolution Mining may be relying more heavily on landfill or incineration, underscoring opportunities for stronger resource recovery initiatives.
Since 2020, Evolution Mining's total waste generation remained relatively flat, but increased by 27.46% in 2024 , potentially signaling a short-term operational expansion or reduced focus on waste prevention.
Over the same period, Evolution Mining's waste recovery rate increased by 10,939.33%, while holding steady in 2024, suggesting past gains in recovery performance have stabilized.
Overall, Evolution Mining’s waste generation and recovery data show a mixed and inconsistent trend. A deeper analysis of the company's activities, industry benchmarks, and operational changes is needed to assess its sustainability performance more precisely.
In 2024, Evolution Mining generated a total of 46,932,380 metric tonnes of waste.
Of this amount, 0.02% of Evolution Mining's total waste generated of was classified as hazardous waste, characterized by properties such as toxicity, flammability, corrosiveness, or reactivity that may pose risks to human health, ecosystems, or the environment. 0.05% was identified as non-hazardous waste, generally considered less harmful and subject to lighter regulatory controls. The remaining 99.93% was either treated using unspecified methods or not clearly categorized.
Since 2020, Evolution Mining's total waste generation remained relatively stable, but increased by 27.46% in 2024 , potentially indicating a short-term uptick in output or weakened controls over material efficiency.
Over the same period, the share of hazardous waste decreased by 15.04%, yet rose by 20.94% in 2024, potentially signaling operational variability, temporary setbacks, or less effective hazardous waste mitigation in the short term.
Overall, Evolution Mining's waste and hazardousness trends are mixed or inconclusive. A more detailed review of its materials, industry standards, and operational changes would help clarify the net environmental impact of its waste strategy.
In 2024, Evolution Mining reported that 8,990 metric tonnes of its total waste output were classified as hazardous. This represents 0.02% of its overall waste generation.
The company treated this hazardous waste using a combination of methods. Approximately 44.05% was managed through recovery methods, indicating a moderate integration of circular practices into its hazardous waste management. However, a significant share was still directed toward disposal, highlighting room for improvement in reducing the long-term impact of hazardous materials.