In 2025, Sandvik conducted an environmental assessment and disclosed corporate waste management data in accordance with recognized sustainability reporting standards.The company provided a breakdown of its waste by type (hazardous vs non-hazardous) and treatment method (recovery vs disposal), enabling greater transparency into its waste handling and environmental practices.
| Metric (tonnes) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022-2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Waste Generated | 398,751a | 371,535a | 332,836a | |
Total Waste Recovered | 46,649a | 51,897a | 49,128a | |
Total Hazardous Waste Generated | 22,620a | 20,520a | 20,248a | |
Non-Hazardous Waste Disposed | 337,534a | 305,652a | 270,404a |
You are welcome to quote or reference individual data points from this page, provided you include the following attribution with a visible, clickable link to this page: "Source: Tracenable, the global reference for ESG data"
Bulk collection, scraping, resale, or redistribution of data across multiple company profiles is not permitted without our prior written permission. For more information, see our General Terms and Conditions.
Every figure on this dashboard has a transparent audit trail. With Tracenable, each data point is traceable back to its original source, viewable directly inside our platform.
In 2025, Sandvik generated a total of 398,751metric tonnes of waste.a
Of this amount, 11.7% of Sandvik's total waste generated was recovered through methods such as recycling, reuse, or composting, while 88.3% was disposed of through landfilling, incineration, or combustion.a
In 2025, Sandvik reported a total waste generation of 398,751 metric tonnes, of which 11.7% was recovered through recycling, reuse, or composting.This low recovery rate highlights limited waste diversion and suggests that Sandvik may be relying more heavily on landfill or incineration, underscoring opportunities for stronger resource recovery initiatives.a
Since 2023, Sandvik's total waste generation increased by 19.8%, including a 7.33%increase in 2025, indicating a persistent upward trend that may reflect scaling operations, inefficiencies in resource use, or a lack of effective waste minimization practices.a
Over the same period, Sandvik's waste recovery rate declined by 20.74%, with a further 16.25% drop in 2025, underscoring a weakening in waste diversion performance and a potential drift away from circular waste strategies.a
Overall, Sandvik is generating more waste while simultaneously backsliding on recovery efforts, both in the short and long term. This dual negative trend raises concerns about the company’s waste management priorities and its alignment with sustainability goals.
In 2025, Sandvik generated a total of 398,751 metric tonnes of waste.a
Of this amount, 5.67% of Sandvik's total waste generated of was classified as hazardous waste, characterized by properties such as toxicity, flammability, corrosiveness, or reactivity that may pose risks to human health, ecosystems, or the environment.94.33% was identified as non-hazardous waste, generally considered less harmful and subject to lighter regulatory controls.a
Since 2023, Sandvik's total waste generation increased by 19.8%, including a 7.33% rise in 2025, reflecting a persistent upward trend that could be linked to operational growth, inefficient material use, or limited investment in waste prevention systems.a
Over the same period, the share of hazardous waste decreased by 6.75%, yet rose by 2.71% in 2025, potentially signaling operational variability, temporary setbacks, or less effective hazardous waste mitigation in the short term.a
Overall, Sandvik's waste and hazardousness trends are mixed or inconclusive. A more detailed review of its materials, industry standards, and operational changes would help clarify the net environmental impact of its waste strategy.a
In 2025, Sandvik reported that 22,620 metric tonnes of its total waste output were classified as hazardous. This represents 5.67% of its overall waste generation.a
The company treated this hazardous waste using a combination of methods.Approximately 35.6% was managed through recovery methods, indicating a moderate integration of circular practices into its hazardous waste management. However, a significant share was still directed toward disposal, highlighting room for improvement in reducing the long-term impact of hazardous materials.a