In 2025, Swedish Orphan Biovitrum conducted an environmental assessment and disclosed corporate waste management data in accordance with recognized sustainability reporting standards.The company provided a breakdown of its waste by type (hazardous vs non-hazardous) and treatment method (recovery vs disposal), enabling greater transparency into its waste handling and environmental practices.
| Metric (tonnes) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022-2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Waste Generated | 22.7a | 50.7a | 41.4a | |
Total Waste Recovered | 9.3a | 31.3a | 12.8a | |
Total Hazardous Waste Generated | 0.7a | 1.1a | 11.1a | |
Non-Hazardous Waste Disposed | 12.7a | 18.8a | 23.2a |
You are welcome to quote or reference individual data points from this page, provided you include the following attribution with a visible, clickable link to this page: "Source: Tracenable, the global reference for ESG data"
Bulk collection, scraping, resale, or redistribution of data across multiple company profiles is not permitted without our prior written permission. For more information, see our General Terms and Conditions.
Every figure on this dashboard has a transparent audit trail. With Tracenable, each data point is traceable back to its original source, viewable directly inside our platform.
In 2025, Swedish Orphan Biovitrum generated a total of 23metric tonnes of waste.a
Of this amount, 40.97% of Swedish Orphan Biovitrum's total waste generated was recovered through methods such as recycling, reuse, or composting, while 58.59% was disposed of through landfilling, incineration, or combustion.a
In 2025, Swedish Orphan Biovitrum reported a total waste generation of 23 metric tonnes, of which 40.97% was recovered through recycling, reuse, or composting.This moderate level of recovery indicates that Swedish Orphan Biovitrum is taking steps toward improving its waste diversion practices, though there is still room to enhance recycling and recovery efforts.a
Since 2021, Swedish Orphan Biovitrum's total waste generation decreased by 59.03%, including a further 55.23% drop in 2025, highlighting a consistent and deliberate reduction in waste production over time.a
Over the same period, Swedish Orphan Biovitrum's waste recovery rate remained relatively flat, but declined by 33.64% in 2025, potentially pointing to emerging inefficiencies or short-term disruptions in recovery efforts.a
Overall, Swedish Orphan Biovitrum’s waste generation and recovery data show a mixed and inconsistent trend. A deeper analysis of the company's activities, industry benchmarks, and operational changes is needed to assess its sustainability performance more precisely.
In 2025, Swedish Orphan Biovitrum generated a total of 23 metric tonnes of waste.a
Of this amount, 3.08% of Swedish Orphan Biovitrum's total waste generated of was classified as hazardous waste, characterized by properties such as toxicity, flammability, corrosiveness, or reactivity that may pose risks to human health, ecosystems, or the environment.96.48% was identified as non-hazardous waste, generally considered less harmful and subject to lighter regulatory controls.a
Since 2021, Swedish Orphan Biovitrum's total waste generation decreased by 59.03%, with an additional 55.23% decline in 2025, suggesting a consistent and deliberate effort to minimize waste generation at the source.a
Over the same period, the share of hazardous waste decreased by 93.17%, yet rose by 42.13% in 2025, potentially signaling operational variability, temporary setbacks, or less effective hazardous waste mitigation in the short term.a
Overall, Swedish Orphan Biovitrum's waste and hazardousness trends are mixed or inconclusive. A more detailed review of its materials, industry standards, and operational changes would help clarify the net environmental impact of its waste strategy.a
In 2025, Swedish Orphan Biovitrum reported that 1 metric tonnes of its total waste output were classified as hazardous. This represents 3.08% of its overall waste generation.a
The company treated this hazardous waste using a combination of methods.Approximately 14.29% was managed through recovery methods, indicating a moderate integration of circular practices into its hazardous waste management. However, a significant share was still directed toward disposal, highlighting room for improvement in reducing the long-term impact of hazardous materials.a