In 2024, Multipolar Technology completed a corporate carbon footprint assessment and publicly disclosed its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions according to the GHG Protocol, covering Scope 1 (direct emissions from owned or controlled sources) and Scope 2 (indirect emissions from purchased energy).
However, Multipolar Technology has not published a category-level breakdown of its Scope 3 emissions, limiting visibility into specific value chain sources.
| Metric (tCO2e) | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 - 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Scope 1 | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | 0000000 |
Total Scope 2 | ||||
Unspecified Calculation Method | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | 0000000 |
Total Scope 3 | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | 0000000 |
Total Scope 1 Revenue Intensity (tCO2e/$M) | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | 0000000 |
Every figure on this dashboard has a transparent audit trail. With Tracenable, each data point is traceable back to its original source, viewable directly inside our platform. Explore Multipolar Technology’s data sources below and access millions more through our Disclosure Search.
In 2024, the total operational greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of Multipolar Technology amounted to 2,750.73 metric tons of CO2 equivalent. This figure includes both direct emissions from owned or controlled sources (Scope 1) and indirect emissions from purchased energy (Scope 2). a
Compared to 2023, the total operational greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of Multipolar Technology increased by 0.68%, suggesting that the company faced challenges in reducing its emissions from its core operations. a
In 2024, the total Scope 1 emissions of Multipolar Technology were 111.34 metric tons of CO₂ equivalent (tCO₂e). a
Since 2022, Multipolar Technology's Scope 1 emissions have increased by 751.87%, reflecting a rising long-term trend in Scope 1 emissions over time. a
Compared to the previous year (2023), Multipolar Technology's Scope 1 emissions increased by 201.57%, suggesting that the company faced challenges in reducing emissions from its directly owned or controlled operations. a
In 2024, Multipolar Technology reported Scope 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of 2,639.39 tCO₂e without specifying the calculation method. a
Since 2022, Multipolar Technology's Scope 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions ( Unspecified Calculation Method) have remained relatively stable, indicating that Multipolar Technology 's emissions have plateaued with no significant change in its energy consumption footprint. a
Compared to the previous year (2023), Multipolar Technology's Scope 2 emissions (Unspecified Calculation Method) have remained relatively stable, indicating that Multipolar Technology 's emissions have plateaued with no significant change in its energy consumption footprint. a
In 2024, Multipolar Technology reported its Scope 2 emissions using an unspecified methodology. a
In 2024, Multipolar Technology reported Scope 1 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of 111.34 tCO₂e and total revenues of USD 232 millions. This translates into an emissions intensity of 0.48 tCO₂e per millions USD. a
In 2024, Multipolar Technology reported a Scope 1 emissions intensity of 0.48 tCO₂e per millions USD. Compared to the peer group median of 0.62 , this places the company below its industry benchmark, indicating it is more carbon-efficient than most competitors. a
In 2024, Multipolar Technology ranked 10 out of 21 companies in its industry peer group, based on Scope 1 emissions intensity (measured in tCO₂e per millions USD). a
Multipolar Technology is therefore positioned in the mid-range of its industry, neither a clear leader nor a laggard in carbon efficiency. a