In 2025, Sika conducted an environmental assessment and disclosed corporate waste management data in accordance with recognized sustainability reporting standards.The company provided a breakdown of its waste by type (hazardous vs non-hazardous) and treatment method (recovery vs disposal), enabling greater transparency into its waste handling and environmental practices.
| Metric (tonnes) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022-2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Waste Generated | 221,799a | 192,330a | 173,622a | |
Total Waste Recovered | 129,532a | 94,324a | 74,791a | |
Total Hazardous Waste Generated | 28,453a | 24,186a | 22,957a | |
Non-Hazardous Waste Disposed | 72,923a | 80,145a | 82,243a |
You are welcome to quote or reference individual data points from this page, provided you include the following attribution with a visible, clickable link to this page: "Source: Tracenable, the global reference for ESG data"
Bulk collection, scraping, resale, or redistribution of data across multiple company profiles is not permitted without our prior written permission. For more information, see our General Terms and Conditions.
Every figure on this dashboard has a transparent audit trail. With Tracenable, each data point is traceable back to its original source, viewable directly inside our platform.
In 2025, Sika generated a total of 221,799metric tonnes of waste.a
Of this amount, 58.4% of Sika's total waste generated was recovered through methods such as recycling, reuse, or composting, while 41.6% was disposed of through landfilling, incineration, or combustion.a
In 2025, Sika reported a total waste generation of 221,799 metric tonnes, of which 58.4% was recovered through recycling, reuse, or composting.This moderate level of recovery indicates that Sika is taking steps toward improving its waste diversion practices, though there is still room to enhance recycling and recovery efforts.a
Since 2021, Sika's total waste generation increased by 46.34%, including a 15.32%increase in 2025, indicating a persistent upward trend that may reflect scaling operations, inefficiencies in resource use, or a lack of effective waste minimization practices.a
Over the same period, Sika's waste recovery rate increased by 72.04%, including a 19.08% rise in 2025, indicating growing emphasis on circularity and improved operational practices for diverting waste from disposal.a
Overall, Sika has seen a consistent rise in waste generation both over the long term and in the year 2025. However, the company has also steadily improved its waste recovery performance, suggesting that it is actively working to offset the environmental consequences of increased production through enhanced circularity efforts.
In 2025, Sika generated a total of 221,799 metric tonnes of waste.a
Of this amount, 12.83% of Sika's total waste generated of was classified as hazardous waste, characterized by properties such as toxicity, flammability, corrosiveness, or reactivity that may pose risks to human health, ecosystems, or the environment.87.17% was identified as non-hazardous waste, generally considered less harmful and subject to lighter regulatory controls.a
Since 2021, Sika's total waste generation increased by 46.34%, including a 15.32% rise in 2025, reflecting a persistent upward trend that could be linked to operational growth, inefficient material use, or limited investment in waste prevention systems.a
Since 2025, Sika's hazardous waste generation has increased by 2.01%, indicating a potential rise in the use of harmful materials, process inefficiencies, or limited hazardous waste reduction strategies..a
Overall, Sika has seen a recent increase in both total waste and hazardous waste, which may indicate growing operational pressures or insufficient controls on harmful materials.a
In 2025, Sika reported that 28,453 metric tonnes of its total waste output were classified as hazardous. This represents 12.83% of its overall waste generation.a
The company treated this hazardous waste using a combination of methods.Approximately 32.01% was managed through recovery methods, indicating a moderate integration of circular practices into its hazardous waste management. However, a significant share was still directed toward disposal, highlighting room for improvement in reducing the long-term impact of hazardous materials.a