Storebrand ASA
Storebrand ASA Waste Data Preview
In 2023, Storebrand ASA conducted an environmental assessment and disclosed corporate waste management data in accordance with recognized sustainability reporting standards. The company provided a breakdown of its waste by type (hazardous vs non-hazardous) and treatment method (recovery vs disposal), enabling greater transparency into its waste handling and environmental practices.
| Metric (tonnes) | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 - 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Waste Generated | 0000000 | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data.  | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data.  | 0000000 |
Total Waste Recovered | 0000000 | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data.  | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data.  | 0000000 |
Total Hazardous Waste Generated | 0000000 | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data.  | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data.  | 0000000 |
Non-Hazardous Waste Disposed | 0000000 | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data.  | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data.  | 0000000 |
This table provides a simplified preview of selected waste data points. To access the complete dataset with full disclosures and structure, create a free account to purchase the full dataset.
Insights into Storebrand ASA's Waste Treatment Practices
In 2023, Storebrand ASA generated a total of 112 metric tonnes of waste.
Of this amount, 64.79% of Storebrand ASA's total waste generated was recovered through methods such as recycling, reuse, or composting, while 35.21% was disposed of through landfilling, incineration, or combustion.
Storebrand ASA's Waste Recovery Rate
How much of Storebrand ASA's waste is recycled or recovered?
In 2023, Storebrand ASA reported a total waste generation of 112 metric tonnes, of which 64.79% was recovered through recycling, reuse, or composting. This moderate level of recovery indicates that Storebrand ASA is taking steps toward improving its waste diversion practices, though there is still room to enhance recycling and recovery efforts.
Has Storebrand ASA reduced its environmental waste footprint over time?
Since 2023, Storebrand ASA's total waste generation has decreased by 7.07%, suggesting improvements in operational efficiency or the early results of waste minimization strategies.
Over the same period, Storebrand ASA's waste recovery rate increased by 74.95%.
Storebrand ASA’s Waste Recovery vs. Disposal Over Time
- Total Waste Disposed
- Total Waste Recovered
Insights into Storebrand ASA’s Generation of Hazardous and Non-Hazardous Waste
In 2023, Storebrand ASA generated a total of 112 metric tonnes of waste.
Of this amount, 34.65% of Storebrand ASA's total waste generated of was classified as hazardous waste, characterized by properties such as toxicity, flammability, corrosiveness, or reactivity that may pose risks to human health, ecosystems, or the environment. 65.35% was identified as non-hazardous waste, generally considered less harmful and subject to lighter regulatory controls.
Storebrand ASA’s Hazardous vs Non-Hazardous Waste Over Time
- Total Non-Hazardous Waste Generated
- Total Hazardous Waste Generated
How Storebrand ASA reduced the environmental impact of its waste?
Since 2023, Storebrand ASA's total waste generation has decreased by 7.07%, suggesting improvements in operational efficiency or the early results of waste minimization strategies.
Since 2023, Storebrand ASA's hazardous waste generation has decreased by 7.77%, suggesting a recent shift toward safer materials, improved waste handling protocols, or stronger compliance with environmental standards.
Overall, Storebrand ASA has reduced both its total waste and hazardous waste in the last year, suggesting effective waste management practices and improved material sourcing.
How does Storebrand ASA treat its hazardous waste?
In 2023, Storebrand ASA reported that 39 metric tonnes of its total waste output were classified as hazardous. This represents 34.65% of its overall waste generation.
The company treated this hazardous waste using a combination of methods. Only 3.4% of hazardous waste was recovered, meaning the vast majority was treated through disposal methods such as landfilling or incineration. This raises concerns about the environmental and health risks associated with Storebrand ASA’s current hazardous waste practices.