In 2023, Aditya Birla Capital conducted an environmental assessment and disclosed corporate waste management data in accordance with recognized sustainability reporting standards.The company provided a breakdown of its waste by type (hazardous vs non-hazardous) and treatment method (recovery vs disposal), enabling greater transparency into its waste handling and environmental practices.
| Metric (tonnes) | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020-2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Waste Generated | 53.903a | 18.045a | 5.183a | |
Total Waste Recovered | 53.903a | N/A | N/A | |
Total Hazardous Waste Generated | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
Non-Hazardous Waste Disposed | N/A | N/A | N/A |
You are welcome to quote or reference individual data points from this page, provided you include the following attribution with a visible, clickable link to this page: "Source: Tracenable, the global reference for ESG data"
Bulk collection, scraping, resale, or redistribution of data across multiple company profiles is not permitted without our prior written permission. For more information, see our General Terms and Conditions.
Every figure on this dashboard has a transparent audit trail. With Tracenable, each data point is traceable back to its original source, viewable directly inside our platform.
In 2023, Aditya Birla Capital generated a total of 54metric tonnes of waste.a
Of this amount, 100% of Aditya Birla Capital's total waste generated was recovered through methods such as recycling, reuse, or composting, while 0% was disposed of through landfilling, incineration, or combustion.a
In 2023, Aditya Birla Capital reported a total waste generation of 54 metric tonnes, of which 100% was recovered through recycling, reuse, or composting.This high recovery rate suggests that Aditya Birla Capital has implemented strong circular economy practices and actively prioritizes sustainable waste management.a
Since 2020, Aditya Birla Capital's total waste generation increased by 81.49%, including a 198.72%increase in 2023, indicating a persistent upward trend that may reflect scaling operations, inefficiencies in resource use, or a lack of effective waste minimization practices.a