Studsvik AB
Studsvik's GHG Emissions Data Preview
In 2025, Studsvik completed a corporate carbon footprint assessment and publicly disclosed its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions according to the GHG Protocol, covering Scope 1 (direct emissions from owned or controlled sources) and Scope 2 (indirect emissions from purchased energy).
However, Studsvik has not published a category-level breakdown of its Scope 3 emissions, limiting visibility into specific value chain sources.
| Metric (tCO2e) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 - 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Scope 1 | 0000000 | Copy/Paste is a PRO feature.  b | Copy/Paste is a PRO feature.  b | 0000000 |
Total Scope 2 | ||||
Market-Based | Copy/Paste is a PRO feature.  a | 0000000 | Copy/Paste is a PRO feature.  | 0000000 |
Location-Based | Copy/Paste is a PRO feature.  a | 0000000 | Copy/Paste is a PRO feature. | 0000000 |
Unspecified Calculation Method | Copy/Paste is a PRO feature. | 0000000 | Copy/Paste is a PRO feature.  b | 0000000 |
Total Scope 3 | Copy/Paste is a PRO feature. | Copy/Paste is a PRO feature. | 0000000 | 0000000 |
Total Scope 1 Revenue Intensity (tCO2e/$M) | 0000000 | Copy/Paste is a PRO feature.  b | Copy/Paste is a PRO feature.  b | 0000000 |
Verified Sources Behind Studsvik’s Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Data
Every figure on this dashboard has a transparent audit trail. With Tracenable, each data point is traceable back to its original source, viewable directly inside our platform. Explore Studsvik’s data sources below and access millions more through our Disclosure Search.
Insights into Studsvik's Operational Emissions
In 2025, the total operational greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of Studsvik amounted to 450.84 metric tons of CO2 equivalent. This figure includes both direct emissions from owned or controlled sources (Scope 1) and indirect emissions from purchased energy (Scope 2).a
Compared to 2024, the total operational greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of Studsvik decreased by 64.42%, showing that the company has made progress in taking action to reduce the climate impact of its operations.ab
Studsvik's Scope 1 Emissions Over Time
- Total Scope 1
- Year-over-Year Change
What are Studsvik's Scope 1 emissions?
In 2025, the total Scope 1 emissions of Studsvik were 274.84 metric tons of CO₂ equivalent (tCO₂e).a
Has Studsvik reduced its Scope 1 emissions over time?
Since 2019, Studsvik's Scope 1 emissions have decreased by 45.36%, reflecting a declining long-term trend in Scope 1 emissions over time.ab
Compared to the previous year (2024), Studsvik's Scope 1 emissions decreased by 61.88%, highlighting the company's efforts to lower direct emissions from assets it owns or controls.ab
What are Studsvik's Scope 2 emissions?
In 2025, Studsvik reported Scope 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of 39.93 tCO₂e using the market-based method and 176 tCO₂e using the location-based method.a
What methodology does Studsvik use for Scope 2 reporting?
In 2025, Studsvik reported its Scope 2 emissions using the market-based method and using the location-based method.a
Studsvik's Scope 2 Emissions Over Time
- Total Scope 2 Location-Based
- Total Scope 2 Market-Based
- Total Scope 2 (Unspecified Calculation Method)
Insights into Studsvik’s GHG Emissions Intensity Compared to Industry Peers
In 2025, Studsvik reported Scope 1 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of 274.84 tCO₂e and total revenues of USD 96 millions. This translates into an emissions intensity of 2.86 tCO₂e per millions USD.a
Studsvik's Scope 1 Emissions Intensity Compared to Peers
How does Studsvik's GHG emissions intensity compare to its peers?
In 2025, Studsvik reported a Scope 1 emissions intensity of 2.86 tCO₂e per millions USD. Compared to the peer group median of 7.66, this places the company below its industry benchmark, indicating it is more carbon-efficient than most competitors.a
Where does Studsvik rank on GHG emissions intensity within its industry?
In 2025, Studsvik ranked 6 out of 21 companies in its industry peer group, based on Scope 1 emissions intensity (measured in tCO₂e per millions USD).a
Studsvik is therefore positioned in the mid-range of its industry, neither a clear leader nor a laggard in carbon efficiency.a