In 2025, Top Glove conducted an environmental assessment and disclosed corporate waste management data in accordance with recognized sustainability reporting standards.The company provided a breakdown of its waste by type (hazardous vs non-hazardous) and treatment method (recovery vs disposal), enabling greater transparency into its waste handling and environmental practices.
| Metric (tonnes) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022-2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Waste Generated | 30,074a | 25,177a | 20,587a | |
Total Waste Recovered | 18,978a | 19,852a | 15,727a | |
Total Hazardous Waste Generated | 7,153a | 6,499a | 6,945a | |
Non-Hazardous Waste Disposed | 6,572a | 3,575a | 3,004a |
You are welcome to quote or reference individual data points from this page, provided you include the following attribution with a visible, clickable link to this page: "Source: Tracenable, the global reference for ESG data"
Bulk collection, scraping, resale, or redistribution of data across multiple company profiles is not permitted without our prior written permission. For more information, see our General Terms and Conditions.
Every figure on this dashboard has a transparent audit trail. With Tracenable, each data point is traceable back to its original source, viewable directly inside our platform.
In 2025, Top Glove generated a total of 30,074metric tonnes of waste.a
Of this amount, 63.1% of Top Glove's total waste generated was recovered through methods such as recycling, reuse, or composting, while 36.89% was disposed of through landfilling, incineration, or combustion.a
In 2025, Top Glove reported a total waste generation of 30,074 metric tonnes, of which 63.1% was recovered through recycling, reuse, or composting.This moderate level of recovery indicates that Top Glove is taking steps toward improving its waste diversion practices, though there is still room to enhance recycling and recovery efforts.a
Since 2023, Top Glove's total waste generation increased by 46.08%, including a 19.45%increase in 2025, indicating a persistent upward trend that may reflect scaling operations, inefficiencies in resource use, or a lack of effective waste minimization practices.a
Over the same period, Top Glove's waste recovery rate declined by 17.39%, with a further 19.97% drop in 2025, underscoring a weakening in waste diversion performance and a potential drift away from circular waste strategies.a
Overall, Top Glove is generating more waste while simultaneously backsliding on recovery efforts, both in the short and long term. This dual negative trend raises concerns about the company’s waste management priorities and its alignment with sustainability goals.
In 2025, Top Glove generated a total of 30,074 metric tonnes of waste.a
Of this amount, 23.78% of Top Glove's total waste generated of was classified as hazardous waste, characterized by properties such as toxicity, flammability, corrosiveness, or reactivity that may pose risks to human health, ecosystems, or the environment.76.22% was identified as non-hazardous waste, generally considered less harmful and subject to lighter regulatory controls.a
Since 2023, Top Glove's total waste generation increased by 46.08%, including a 19.45% rise in 2025, reflecting a persistent upward trend that could be linked to operational growth, inefficient material use, or limited investment in waste prevention systems.a
Over the same period, Top Glove reduced the hazardousness of its waste by 29.5%, with a further 7.86% decline in 2025, suggesting a sustained and meaningful shift toward safer waste profiles and lower environmental impact.a
Overall, Top Glove is generating more waste but has significantly reduced the share of hazardous materials, suggesting a partial decoupling of volume and toxicity that could reflect more responsible inputs or enhanced treatment.a
In 2025, Top Glove reported that 7,153 metric tonnes of its total waste output were classified as hazardous. This represents 23.78% of its overall waste generation.a
The company treated this hazardous waste using a combination of methods.Approximately 36.75% was managed through recovery methods, indicating a moderate integration of circular practices into its hazardous waste management. However, a significant share was still directed toward disposal, highlighting room for improvement in reducing the long-term impact of hazardous materials.a