In 2025, Martela completed a corporate carbon footprint assessment and publicly disclosed its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions according to the GHG Protocol, covering Scope 1 (direct emissions from owned or controlled sources) and Scope 3 (indirect emissions across the value chain).
Martela has also provided a category-level breakdown for 6 out of 15 Scope 3 emissions categories, offering greater transparency into its value chain emissions.
| Metric (tCO2e) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 - 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Scope 1 | 0000000 | Copy/Paste is a PRO feature. | Copy/Paste is a PRO feature. | 0000000 |
Total Scope 2 | ||||
Unspecified Calculation Method | Copy/Paste is a PRO feature. | 0000000 | Copy/Paste is a PRO feature. | 0000000 |
Total Scope 3 | Copy/Paste is a PRO feature. | Copy/Paste is a PRO feature. | 0000000 | 0000000 |
Total Scope 1 Revenue Intensity (tCO2e/$M) | 0000000 | Copy/Paste is a PRO feature. | Copy/Paste is a PRO feature. | 0000000 |
Every figure on this dashboard has a transparent audit trail. With Tracenable, each data point is traceable back to its original source, viewable directly inside our platform. Explore Martela’s data sources below and access millions more through our Disclosure Search.
In 2025, the total operational greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of Martela amounted to 1,076 metric tons of CO2 equivalent. This figure reflects direct emissions from owned or controlled sources (Scope 1).a
Compared to 2024, the total operational greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of Martela decreased by 11.66%, showing that the company has made progress in taking action to reduce the climate impact of its operations.ab
In 2025, the total Scope 1 emissions of Martela were 1,076 metric tons of CO₂ equivalent (tCO₂e).a
Since 2020, Martela's Scope 1 emissions have increased by 40.47%, reflecting a rising long-term trend in Scope 1 emissions over time.ac
Compared to the previous year (2024), Martela's Scope 1 emissions increased by 29.33%, suggesting that the company faced challenges in reducing emissions from its directly owned or controlled operations.ab
In 2025, Martela reported 10,432 metric tons of CO₂ equivalent (tCO₂e) of Scope 3 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, representing indirect emissions across its upstream and downstream value chain.a
The 2025 disclosure of Martela includes a breakdown across 5 of the 15 Scope 3 categories defined by the GHG Protocol, down from 6 in 2024, indicating a decline in reporting granularity and reduced insight into the company's full value chain emissions.a
In 2025, Martela reported total Scope 3 emissions of 10,432 metric tons of CO₂ equivalent (tCO₂e).a
Approximately 100% of these emissions originated from upstream activities such as purchased goods and capital goods, while 0% came from downstream activities like product use, distribution, and end-of-life treatment.a
Since 2020, Martela's Scope 3 emissions have increased by 14.85%, reflecting a rising long-term trend in Scope 3 emissions over time.ac
Compared to the previous year (2024), Martela's Scope 3 emissions decreased by 20.51%, highlighting the company's efforts to lower indirect emissions from its value chain.ab
In 2025, Martela reported emissions for 5 out of the 15 Scope 3 categories defined by the GHG Protocol.a
This partial disclosure allows for some insight into the company's indirect impacts.
In 2025, the largest contributors to Martela's Scope 3 emissions were:a
In 2025, Martela reported Scope 1 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of 1,076 tCO₂e and total revenues of USD 110 millions. This translates into an emissions intensity of 9.77 tCO₂e per millions USD.a
In 2025, Martela reported a Scope 1 emissions intensity of 9.77 tCO₂e per millions USD. Compared to the peer group median of 8.76, this places the company above its industry benchmark, indicating it is less carbon-efficient than most competitors.a
In 2025, Martela ranked 14 out of 23 companies in its industry peer group, based on Scope 1 emissions intensity (measured in tCO₂e per millions USD).a
Martela is therefore positioned in the mid-range of its industry, neither a clear leader nor a laggard in carbon efficiency.a