In 2024, Martin Marietta Materials completed a corporate carbon footprint assessment and publicly disclosed its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions according to the GHG Protocol, covering Scope 1 (direct emissions from owned or controlled sources) and Scope 2 (indirect emissions from purchased energy).
However, Martin Marietta Materials has not published a category-level breakdown of its Scope 3 emissions, limiting visibility into specific value chain sources.
| Metric (tCO2e) | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 - 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Scope 1 | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | 0000000 |
Total Scope 2 | ||||
Unspecified Calculation Method | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | 0000000 |
Total Scope 3 | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | 0000000 |
Total Scope 1 Revenue Intensity (tCO2e/$M) | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | 0000000 |
Every figure on this dashboard has a transparent audit trail. With Tracenable, each data point is traceable back to its original source, viewable directly inside our platform. Explore Martin Marietta Materials’s data sources below and access millions more through our Disclosure Search.
In 2024, the total operational greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of Martin Marietta Materials amounted to 3,402,729 metric tons of CO2 equivalent. This figure includes both direct emissions from owned or controlled sources (Scope 1) and indirect emissions from purchased energy (Scope 2). a
Compared to 2023, the total operational greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of Martin Marietta Materials decreased by 30.63%, showing that the company has made progress in taking action to reduce the climate impact of its operations. a b
In 2024, the total Scope 1 emissions of Martin Marietta Materials were 2,900,000 metric tons of CO₂ equivalent (tCO₂e). a
Since 2020, Martin Marietta Materials's Scope 1 emissions have decreased by 35.63%, reflecting a declining long-term trend in Scope 1 emissions over time. a d
Compared to the previous year (2023), Martin Marietta Materials's Scope 1 emissions decreased by 32.48%, highlighting the company's efforts to lower direct emissions from assets it owns or controls. a b
In 2024, Martin Marietta Materials reported Scope 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of 502,729 tCO₂e without specifying the calculation method. a
Since 2020, Martin Marietta Materials's Scope 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions ( Unspecified Calculation Method) have decreased by 25.08%, reflecting a declining long-term trend in Scope 2 emissions over time. a d
Compared to the previous year (2023), Martin Marietta Materials's Scope 2 emissions (Unspecified Calculation Method) fell by 17.59% in 2024, showing that the company has made progress in taking action to reduce the climate impact of its energy consumption. a b
In 2024, Martin Marietta Materials reported its Scope 2 emissions using an unspecified methodology. a
In 2024, Martin Marietta Materials reported Scope 1 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of 2,900,000 tCO₂e and total revenues of USD 6,536 millions. This translates into an emissions intensity of 443.7 tCO₂e per millions USD. a
In 2024, Martin Marietta Materials reported a Scope 1 emissions intensity of 443.7 tCO₂e per millions USD. Compared to the peer group median of 36.4 , this places the company above its industry benchmark, indicating it is less carbon-efficient than most competitors. a
In 2024, Martin Marietta Materials ranked 19 out of 21 companies in its industry peer group, based on Scope 1 emissions intensity (measured in tCO₂e per millions USD). a
This places Martin Marietta Materials among the least efficient performers, with one of the highest emissions intensities in its sector. a