In 2026, State Bank of India conducted an environmental assessment and disclosed corporate waste management data in accordance with recognized sustainability reporting standards.The company provided a breakdown of its waste by type (hazardous vs non-hazardous) and treatment method (recovery vs disposal), enabling greater transparency into its waste handling and environmental practices.
| Metric (tonnes) | 2026 | 2025 | 2024 | 2023-2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Waste Generated | 3,826.69a | 4,926.3a | 6,719a | |
Total Waste Recovered | 843a | 844a | 2,254a | |
Total Hazardous Waste Generated | 1,279.17a | 1,095.06a | 902a | |
Non-Hazardous Waste Disposed | 1,919.39a | 2,996.85a | 4,119a |
You are welcome to quote or reference individual data points from this page, provided you include the following attribution with a visible, clickable link to this page: "Source: Tracenable, the global reference for ESG data"
Bulk collection, scraping, resale, or redistribution of data across multiple company profiles is not permitted without our prior written permission. For more information, see our General Terms and Conditions.
Every figure on this dashboard has a transparent audit trail. With Tracenable, each data point is traceable back to its original source, viewable directly inside our platform.
In 2026, State Bank of India generated a total of 3,827metric tonnes of waste.a
Of this amount, 22.03% of State Bank of India's total waste generated was recovered through methods such as recycling, reuse, or composting, while 76.99% was disposed of through landfilling, incineration, or combustion.a
In 2026, State Bank of India reported a total waste generation of 3,827 metric tonnes, of which 22.03% was recovered through recycling, reuse, or composting.This low recovery rate highlights limited waste diversion and suggests that State Bank of India may be relying more heavily on landfill or incineration, underscoring opportunities for stronger resource recovery initiatives.a
Since 2024, State Bank of India's total waste generation decreased by 43.05%, including a further 22.32% drop in 2026, highlighting a consistent and deliberate reduction in waste production over time.a
Over the same period, State Bank of India's waste recovery rate declined by 34.33%, yet improved by 28.58% in 2026, pointing to a recent rebound or renewed focus on better waste treatment outcomes.a
Overall, State Bank of India’s waste generation and recovery data show a mixed and inconsistent trend. A deeper analysis of the company's activities, industry benchmarks, and operational changes is needed to assess its sustainability performance more precisely.
In 2026, State Bank of India generated a total of 3,827 metric tonnes of waste.a
Of this amount, 33.43% of State Bank of India's total waste generated of was classified as hazardous waste, characterized by properties such as toxicity, flammability, corrosiveness, or reactivity that may pose risks to human health, ecosystems, or the environment.66.57% was identified as non-hazardous waste, generally considered less harmful and subject to lighter regulatory controls.a
Since 2024, State Bank of India's total waste generation decreased by 43.05%, with an additional 22.32% decline in 2026, suggesting a consistent and deliberate effort to minimize waste generation at the source.a
Over the same period, the share of hazardous waste in State Bank of India's total output increased by 149%, including a further 50.38% rise in 2026, suggesting a troubling upward shift toward more environmentally harmful waste streams that could raise compliance costs and environmental risks.a
Overall, State Bank of India's waste and hazardousness trends are mixed or inconclusive. A more detailed review of its materials, industry standards, and operational changes would help clarify the net environmental impact of its waste strategy.a
In 2026, State Bank of India reported that 1,279 metric tonnes of its total waste output were classified as hazardous. This represents 33.43% of its overall waste generation.a
The company treated this hazardous waste using a combination of methods.Approximately 16.61% was managed through recovery methods, indicating a moderate integration of circular practices into its hazardous waste management. However, a significant share was still directed toward disposal, highlighting room for improvement in reducing the long-term impact of hazardous materials.a