Daniel Thwaites PLC
Daniel Thwaites's GHG Emissions Data Preview
In 2025, Daniel Thwaites completed a corporate carbon footprint assessment and publicly disclosed its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions according to the GHG Protocol, covering Scope 1 (direct emissions from owned or controlled sources) and Scope 2 (indirect emissions from purchased energy).
However, Daniel Thwaites has not published a category-level breakdown of its Scope 3 emissions, limiting visibility into specific value chain sources.
| Metric (tCO2e) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 - 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Scope 1 | 0000000 | Copy/Paste is a PRO feature.  a | Copy/Paste is a PRO feature.  | 0000000 |
Total Scope 2 | ||||
Unspecified Calculation Method | Copy/Paste is a PRO feature.  a | 0000000 | Copy/Paste is a PRO feature. | 0000000 |
Total Scope 3 | Copy/Paste is a PRO feature. | Copy/Paste is a PRO feature. | 0000000 | 0000000 |
Total Scope 1 Revenue Intensity (tCO2e/$M) | 0000000 | Copy/Paste is a PRO feature.  a | Copy/Paste is a PRO feature. | 0000000 |
Verified Sources Behind Daniel Thwaites’s Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Data
Every figure on this dashboard has a transparent audit trail. With Tracenable, each data point is traceable back to its original source, viewable directly inside our platform. Explore Daniel Thwaites’s data sources below and access millions more through our Disclosure Search.
Insights into Daniel Thwaites's Operational Emissions
In 2025, the total operational greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of Daniel Thwaites amounted to 7,421 metric tons of CO2 equivalent. This figure includes both direct emissions from owned or controlled sources (Scope 1) and indirect emissions from purchased energy (Scope 2).a
Compared to 2024, the total operational greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of Daniel Thwaites increased by 5.52%, suggesting that the company faced challenges in reducing its emissions from its core operations.a
Daniel Thwaites's Scope 1 Emissions Over Time
- Total Scope 1
- Year-over-Year Change
What are Daniel Thwaites's Scope 1 emissions?
In 2025, the total Scope 1 emissions of Daniel Thwaites were 4,392 metric tons of CO₂ equivalent (tCO₂e).a
Compared to the previous year (2024), Daniel Thwaites's Scope 1 emissions increased by 5.93%, suggesting that the company faced challenges in reducing emissions from its directly owned or controlled operations.a
What are Daniel Thwaites's Scope 2 emissions?
In 2025, Daniel Thwaites reported Scope 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of 3,029 tCO₂e without specifying the calculation method.a
Has Daniel Thwaites reduced its Scope 2 emissions over time?
Compared to the previous year (2024), Daniel Thwaites's Scope 2 emissions (Unspecified Calculation Method) have remained relatively stable, indicating that Daniel Thwaites's emissions have plateaued with no significant change in its energy consumption footprint.a
What methodology does Daniel Thwaites use for Scope 2 reporting?
In 2025, Daniel Thwaites reported its Scope 2 emissions using an unspecified methodology.a
Daniel Thwaites's Scope 2 Emissions Over Time
- Total Scope 2 (Unspecified Calculation Method)
Insights into Daniel Thwaites’s GHG Emissions Intensity Compared to Industry Peers
In 2025, Daniel Thwaites reported Scope 1 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of 4,392 tCO₂e and total revenues of USD 156 millions. This translates into an emissions intensity of 28.15 tCO₂e per millions USD.a
Daniel Thwaites's Scope 1 Emissions Intensity Compared to Peers
How does Daniel Thwaites's GHG emissions intensity compare to its peers?
In 2025, Daniel Thwaites reported a Scope 1 emissions intensity of 28.15 tCO₂e per millions USD. Compared to the peer group median of 8.13, this places the company above its industry benchmark, indicating it is less carbon-efficient than most competitors.a
Where does Daniel Thwaites rank on GHG emissions intensity within its industry?
In 2025, Daniel Thwaites ranked 7 out of 8 companies in its industry peer group, based on Scope 1 emissions intensity (measured in tCO₂e per millions USD).a
This places Daniel Thwaites among the least efficient performers, with one of the highest emissions intensities in its sector.a