PBF Energy Inc
PBF Energy's GHG Emissions Data Preview
In 2024, PBF Energy completed a corporate carbon footprint assessment and publicly disclosed its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions according to the GHG Protocol, covering Scope 1 (direct emissions from owned or controlled sources) and Scope 2 (indirect emissions from purchased energy).
However, PBF Energy has not published a category-level breakdown of its Scope 3 emissions, limiting visibility into specific value chain sources.
| Metric (tCO2e) | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 - 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Scope 1 | 0000000 | Copy/Paste is a PRO feature.  a | Copy/Paste is a PRO feature.  a | 0000000 |
Total Scope 2 | ||||
Location-Based | Copy/Paste is a PRO feature.  a | 0000000 | Copy/Paste is a PRO feature.  a | 0000000 |
Total Scope 3 | Copy/Paste is a PRO feature.  | Copy/Paste is a PRO feature. | 0000000 | 0000000 |
Total Scope 1 Revenue Intensity (tCO2e/$M) | 0000000 | Copy/Paste is a PRO feature.  a | Copy/Paste is a PRO feature.  a | 0000000 |
Verified Sources Behind PBF Energy’s Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Data
Every figure on this dashboard has a transparent audit trail. With Tracenable, each data point is traceable back to its original source, viewable directly inside our platform. Explore PBF Energy’s data sources below and access millions more through our Disclosure Search.
Insights into PBF Energy's Operational Emissions
In 2024, the total operational greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of PBF Energy amounted to 11,320,000 metric tons of CO2 equivalent. This figure includes both direct emissions from owned or controlled sources (Scope 1) and indirect emissions from purchased energy (Scope 2).a
Compared to 2023, the total operational greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of PBF Energy decreased by 2.83%, showing that the company has made progress in taking action to reduce the climate impact of its operations.a
PBF Energy's Scope 1 Emissions Over Time
- Total Scope 1
- Year-over-Year Change
What are PBF Energy's Scope 1 emissions?
In 2024, the total Scope 1 emissions of PBF Energy were 10,460,000 metric tons of CO₂ equivalent (tCO₂e).a
Has PBF Energy reduced its Scope 1 emissions over time?
Since 2021, PBF Energy's Scope 1 emissions have decreased by 26.13%, reflecting a declining long-term trend in Scope 1 emissions over time.ab
Compared to the previous year (2023), PBF Energy's Scope 1 emissions decreased by 2.97%, highlighting the company's efforts to lower direct emissions from assets it owns or controls.a
What are PBF Energy's Scope 2 emissions?
In 2024, PBF Energy reported Scope 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of 860,000 tCO₂e using the location-based method.a
Has PBF Energy reduced its Scope 2 emissions over time?
Compared to the previous year (2023), PBF Energy's Scope 2 emissions (Location-Based) have remained relatively stable, indicating that PBF Energy's emissions have plateaued with no significant change in its energy consumption footprint.a
What methodology does PBF Energy use for Scope 2 reporting?
In 2024, PBF Energy reported its Scope 2 emissions using the location-based method.a
PBF Energy's Scope 2 Emissions Over Time
- Total Scope 2 Location-Based
Insights into PBF Energy’s GHG Emissions Intensity Compared to Industry Peers
In 2024, PBF Energy reported Scope 1 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of 10,460,000 tCO₂e and total revenues of USD 33,115 millions. This translates into an emissions intensity of 315.87 tCO₂e per millions USD.a
PBF Energy's Scope 1 Emissions Intensity Compared to Peers
How does PBF Energy's GHG emissions intensity compare to its peers?
In 2024, PBF Energy reported a Scope 1 emissions intensity of 315.87 tCO₂e per millions USD. Compared to the peer group median of 248.93, this places the company above its industry benchmark, indicating it is less carbon-efficient than most competitors.a
Where does PBF Energy rank on GHG emissions intensity within its industry?
In 2024, PBF Energy ranked 17 out of 24 companies in its industry peer group, based on Scope 1 emissions intensity (measured in tCO₂e per millions USD).a
PBF Energy is therefore positioned in the mid-range of its industry, neither a clear leader nor a laggard in carbon efficiency.a