In 2025, Mineral Resources completed a corporate carbon footprint assessment and publicly disclosed its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions according to the GHG Protocol, covering Scope 1 (direct emissions from owned or controlled sources) and Scope 2 (indirect emissions from purchased energy).
However, Mineral Resources has not published a category-level breakdown of its Scope 3 emissions, limiting visibility into specific value chain sources.
| Metric (tCO2e) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 - 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Scope 1 | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | 0000000 |
Total Scope 2 | ||||
Market-Based | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | 0000000 |
Location-Based | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | 0000000 |
Total Scope 3 | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | 0000000 |
Total Scope 1 Revenue Intensity (tCO2e/$M) | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | Copy restricted. Please purchase to unlock this data. | 0000000 |
Every figure on this dashboard has a transparent audit trail. With Tracenable, each data point is traceable back to its original source, viewable directly inside our platform. Explore Mineral Resources’s data sources below and access millions more through our Disclosure Search.
In 2025, the total operational greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of Mineral Resources amounted to 747,031 metric tons of CO2 equivalent. This figure includes both direct emissions from owned or controlled sources (Scope 1) and indirect emissions from purchased energy (Scope 2). a
Compared to 2024, the total operational greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of Mineral Resources increased by 4.32%, suggesting that the company faced challenges in reducing its emissions from its core operations. a b
In 2025, the total Scope 1 emissions of Mineral Resources were 731,084 metric tons of CO₂ equivalent (tCO₂e). a
Since 2021, Mineral Resources's Scope 1 emissions have increased by 146.7%, reflecting a rising long-term trend in Scope 1 emissions over time. a c
Compared to the previous year (2024), Mineral Resources's Scope 1 emissions increased by 3.7%, suggesting that the company faced challenges in reducing emissions from its directly owned or controlled operations. a b
In 2025, Mineral Resources reported Scope 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of 14,086 tCO₂e using the market-based method and 15,947 tCO₂e using the location-based method. a
Since 2021, Mineral Resources's Scope 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions ( Location-Based) have increased by 700.15%, reflecting a rising long-term trend in Scope 2 emissions over time. a c
Compared to the previous year (2024), Mineral Resources's Scope 2 emissions (Location-Based) rose by 44.2% in 2025, suggesting that the company faced challenges in reducing emissions from purchased electricity and energy a b
In 2025, Mineral Resources reported its Scope 2 emissions using the market-based method and using the location-based method. a
In 2024, Mineral Resources reported Scope 1 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of 705,005 tCO₂e and total revenues of USD 3,508 millions. This translates into an emissions intensity of 200.98 tCO₂e per millions USD. b
In 2024, Mineral Resources reported a Scope 1 emissions intensity of 200.98 tCO₂e per millions USD. Compared to the peer group median of 166.52 , this places the company above its industry benchmark, indicating it is less carbon-efficient than most competitors. b
In 2024, Mineral Resources ranked 15 out of 24 companies in its industry peer group, based on Scope 1 emissions intensity (measured in tCO₂e per millions USD). b
Mineral Resources is therefore positioned in the mid-range of its industry, neither a clear leader nor a laggard in carbon efficiency. b